Larry Diamond—Hoover Institution senior fellow, CDDRL democracy program
coordinator, and former senior advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in
Iraq—has just discussed causes and consequences of corruption and international
efforts to control it with a room full of visiting fellows. This is not just a group of
learned political scientists, however, and Diamond does not hesitate to follow a
sophisticated piece of analysis with a hard-nosed, view-from-the-ground assessment.
He has, for instance, just told the fellows what he thinks of a major development
institution. (“I think the World Bank needs to be ripped apart and fundamentally
restructured.”) He has extended the concept of a “resource curse” to include not
just oil but also international assistance. (“In many countries, aid is like oil; it’s
used for outside rents.”) He has recommended that institutions learn the “dance
of conditionality” and exercise selectivity, choosing countries to invest in based on
demonstrated performance. But the 27 fellows around the table know a thing or
two about corruption. Most of them face it in their home countries; many of them
have made fighting it part of their work. And almost all of their hands go up to tell
Diamond that there is something he missed, or something he got right.
This year’s 27 Stanford Summer Fellows on Democracy and Development—outstanding civic, political, and economic leaders from developing democracies—were selected from more than 500 applicants to take part in the program, which
FSI’s Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) hosted
July 30–August 17, 2007. They traveled to Stanford from 22 countries in transition,
including Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, China, Russia, Egypt, Nigeria, Kenya, and
the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And like their academic curriculum during
the three-week program, which examines linkages among democracy, economic
development, and the rule of law, their professional experiences and fields of study
center on these three areas, assuring that each fellow brings a seasoned perspective
to the program’s discussions.
“Should the United
States promote
democracy? Can the
United States
promote democracy?” The curriculum for the first week focused on defining the concepts of “democracy,”
“development,” and the “rule of law” and identifying institutions that support
democratic and market development. Using selected articles and book chapters as
starting points for discussion, CDDRL Director Michael A. McFaul and Marc Plattner,
National Endowment for Democracy vice-president for research and studies, began
the weeklong module with an examination of what democracy is and what definition
or definitions might apply to distinguish electoral democracy, liberal democracy,
and competitive authoritarianism. Another question discussed was whether there
was such a thing as Islamic democracy, Asian democracy, Russian democracy,
or American democracy.
Faculty including Diamond, CDDRL associate director for research Kathryn Stoner, Stanford president emeritus and constitutional law scholar Gerhard Casper,
Stanford Law School lecturer Erik Jensen, and economists Avner Greif and Seema
Jayachandran “team-taught” individual sessions as the week progressed. Fellows and
faculty discussed how to define and measure development, the role and rule of law
in societies, how legal systems affect democratic development, constitutionalism,
electoral systems, parliamentary versus presidential systems, horizontal accountability,
and market development. Fellows worked in groups to discuss and present their
conclusions about an issue to their colleagues, comparing experiences and sharing
insights into how well political parties and parliaments constrained executive power
and how civil society organizations contributed to democratic consolidation.
In addition to discussing their personal experiences with democracy promotion,
economic development, and legal reform, fellows met with a broad range of
practitioners, including USAID deputy director Maria Rendon Labadan, National
Endowment for Democracy president Carl Gershman, U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth
Circuit Judge Pamela Rymer, IREX president Mark Pomar, Freedom House chairman
and International Center on Nonviolent Conflict founding chair Peter Ackerman, International Center on Nonviolent Conflict president Jack DuVall,
The Orange
Revolution documentary filmmaker Steve York, and government affairs attorney
Patrick Shannon. Guest speakers talked about their fieldwork, offered practical
advice, and answered fellows’ questions.
This component grounded the classroom discussions in a practical context. “It
was important for our visiting fellows to interact with American practitioners, both
to learn about innovative techniques for improving democracy practices but also
to hear about frustrations and failures that Americans also face in working to make
democracy and democracy promotion work more effectively,” explained McFaul. “We
Americans do not have all the answers and have much to learn from interaction with
those in the trenches working to improve governance in their countries.”
As the program’s curriculum shifted to democratic and economic transitions for
week two, McFaul and Stoner-Weiss balanced the structure of the classroom with
guest lecturers, a documentary film premiere, and field trips to Google headquarters
and San Francisco media organizations to put into practical context the components
discussed theoretically in the classroom. The field trip to San Francisco included
a session with KQED Forum executive producer Raul Ramirez, a briefing with the
editorial board at the San Francisco Chronicle, and a discussion of links between
violence against women and children and poverty, health, and security at the Family
Violence Prevention Fund.
“We are building an extraordinary
community of democratic activists and
officials who have a deeper understanding
of the types of institutions that secure
freedom, control corruption, and foster
sustainable development.” The third week’s curriculum looked at international and domestic efforts to promote
democracy, development, and the rule of law. This integrative module drew on the
teaching caliber of Stephen D. Krasner (FSI senior fellow), Peter B. Henry (Graduate School
of Business), Allen S. Weiner and Helen Stacy (Stanford Law School), and Nicholas Hope
(Stanford Center for International Development) as well as Casper, Jensen, McFaul,
and Stoner-Weiss. Through case studies and, in particular, comparison of successes
and failures in the fellows’ own experiences, faculty and fellows explored and assessed
international strategies for promoting rule of law, reconciliation of past human rights
abuses, democracy, and good governance. The discussions, occasionally contentious,
circled in on a set of central questions: Should the United States promote democracy?
Can the United States promote democracy? What are the links between democracy
and increasing the rule of law, controlling corruption, rebuilding societies shattered
by massive human rights violations, and promoting good governance?
Despite the intellectual rigor of the coursework and discussion, and the exploration of
practical applicability with guest speakers and field trips, the Stanford Summer Fellows on
Democracy and Development Program was designed as much to stimulate connections
among field practitioners and to provide a forum in which to exchange ideas. “Through
the summer fellows program, we are building an extraordinary community of democratic
activists and officials who have a deeper understanding of the types of institutions
that secure freedom, control corruption, and foster sustainable development, and
who are keeping in touch with us and with one another,” said Diamond. “When I
meet our ‘alumni’ fellows in subsequent years, they speak movingly of the bonds
they formed and the insights they gained in these three fast-paced weeks.”
To ensure they fulfill their goal of building a small but robust global network of
civic activist and policymakers in developing countries, CDDRL launched a Summer
Fellows Program Alumni Newsletter. The newsletter is based on an interactive
website that will allow the center to strengthen its network of leaders and civic
activists and facilitate more groundbreaking policy analysis across academic fields
and geographic regions, the results of which will be promptly fed back to its activist
alumni in a virtual loop of scholarship and policymaking. “We envision the creation
of an international network of emerging political and civic leaders in countries in
transition,” said Stoner-Weiss, “who can share experiences and solutions to the very
similar problems they and their countries face.”
SSFDD ALUMNI FOCUS: VIOLET GONDA
A producer and pre s ent er
for SW Radio Africa (London), Violet Gonda was a Stanford Summer Fellow
on Democracy and Development in 2006, the same year her station was
named the International Station of the Year by the Association of
International Broadcasters. "CDDRL brings together a cross-section of
people from different backgrounds, different careers," Gonda said.
"Politicians, lawyers, activists ... all in the same room. It is an
amazing group of people."
Banned from returning to her home country
because of her journalism work at the radio station-"we are welcome in
Zimbabwe but only in the prisons"-Gonda "literally eat[s], breathe[s],
and dream[s] Zimbabwe." The summer fellows program, she said, gave her
a broad perspective on what's going on in other countries; "it is so
intensive ... you can really compare and contrast democracy on every
continent." One thing Gonda found is that "when you look at these
leaders, you'd think they all were born of the same mother ... and the
ways people respond to these crises are the same."
Gonda had such a
positive experience at Stanford that she decided to apply for, and was
accepted to, the prestigious John S. Knight Fellowships for journalists
for the academic year 2007-08. "It's always been Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe,
Zimbabwe," she said. "Now I finally have time to sit down and read a
book, write an article, go to seminars, sharpen my skills." She is not
exactly sitting still however. In December she gave a presentation on
Zimbabwe's political situation for the Center on African Studies, and
will also be discussing Zimbabwe at the Palo Alto Rotary Club and the
Bechtel International Center. "Media in America does not have a lot of
international news, particularly on Africa," Gonda said. "So it's a
good opportunity to talk about Zimbabwe, and I will take advantage of
it."
She is also working on developing new content for SW Radio
Africa and plans to interview FSI scholars she met through the summer
fellows program so "We are building an extraordinary community of
democratic activists and officials who have a deeper understanding of
the types of institutions that secure freedom, control corruption, and
foster sustainable development." that Zimbabweans can understand what
is going on in different countries. Close contact with program alumni
means that she has friends and colleagues in other parts of that world
who can be called on for their perspective on situations. While SW
Radio Africa's mission is "to record and to expose" developments in
Zimbabwe, Gonda explained, "it's good to compare, to show people we are
not alone, that this is happening elsewhere."
