Democracy Action Lab

While regime type alone may not guarantee lower levels of corruption in a country, democratic institutions can shape how corruption operates and mitigate its damaging effects. Democratic mechanisms prove to be more effective when accompanied by credible oversight and enforcement and active citizen participation. Ultimately, reform against corruption depends on aligning political incentives, building durable institutions, and fostering accountability from above and below.

While national wealth has long been considered a primary determinant of population health, democratic governance independently improves health outcomes through distinct political mechanisms. Democracies consistently outperform autocracies on metrics such as infant mortality, life expectancy, and disease control — with particularly strong effects for conditions that require sustained policy commitment and equitable service delivery. These benefits materialize primarily through long-term democratic experience rather than short-term regime change, as electoral accountability and responsive institutions require time to develop.

Democracies rarely, if ever, engage in war with one another. The resulting democratic peace theory has been a catalyst for investments in democracy promotion to secure peace. Yet the conclusion that democracy, rather than alternative factors, is the main underlying driver of peace has required extensive research and has faced fundamental empirical challenges. The most sophisticated statistical analysis supports the conclusion that democratic governance is a primary determinant of peaceful relations between similarly democratic states. Scholars also offer theory and evidence on the specific mechanisms that make war less likely between democratic states, although this question remains unsettled. 

Strong democracies directly foster women's rights and empowerment, yet authoritarian regimes increasingly adopt gender reforms for legitimacy without democratizing or adopting egalitarian attitudes. Democratic effects materialize primarily through accumulated democratic experience rather than regime transitions alone, as electoral accountability, open civic spaces, and dispersed power structures enable women's movements to mobilize effectively. Gender equality advances through coordinated efforts across legal, institutional, and societal domains, with democracy serving as a necessary but insufficient condition for sustained transformation in women's status.

Democracies generally do not possess an intrinsic economic advantage over autocracies, but they tend to sustain less volatile economic growth. Scholarly debate concentrates on the causal link between democracy and economic development, seeing as this relationship can be context-dependent and heterogeneous across different forms of democracies and autocracies. However, stronger institutions of accountability and protections for economic rights in democracies have the potential to foster long-term GDP gains.

Democracy can reduce political inequality and expand the provision of public goods, but it does not inherently lead to wealth equality or sustained redistribution. Outcomes depend on political will, institutional design, elite influence, and societal cleavages, with short-term democratization sometimes increasing inequality and longer-term gains requiring stable, modernized systems. Rising inequality may erode public support for democracy, making it crucial for policymakers to understand that economic transformation goes beyond the mere existence of democratic institutions.

Democratic systems invest efficiently in essential infrastructure, responding to citizen demands and improving public oversight.

Democracy protects fundamental rights through institutional frameworks, separation of powers, and constitutional control mechanisms.